Methodology

How URLCarbon calculates a product's carbon footprint

URLCarbon uses a methodology aligned with the principles of ISO 14067:2018 and the GHG Protocol Product Standard. Every report is a cradle-to-grave estimate built from recognised lifecycle datasets and enhanced with AI-assisted modelling where product data is incomplete.

Last updated: July 2026

In short

Standards-aligned

ISO 14067 and GHG Protocol Product Standard principles.

Recognised datasets

Ecoinvent, DEFRA, GLEC, IEA, EPA WARM and peer-reviewed LCAs.

Transparent confidence

Every assumption is disclosed and feeds a per-report confidence score.

URLCarbon references these standards and datasets for methodological alignment. It does not claim formal certification, accreditation, or partnership with any standards body or database provider.

01

Scope & system boundaries

Cradle-to-grave, per unit of product.

Each URLCarbon report estimates the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with one unit of the analysed product, expressed in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent (kg CO₂e) using 100-year Global Warming Potentials (GWP100) consistent with the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report.

The default system boundary is cradle-to-grave, covering:

  • Raw material extraction and processing
  • Component and product manufacturing
  • Primary and secondary packaging
  • Inbound and outbound transport and distribution
  • Product use phase (where relevant — e.g. energy-consuming products)
  • End-of-life treatment (recycling, incineration, landfill)

The functional unit is a single retail unit as sold. Capital goods, corporate overheads, and employee commuting are excluded, in line with standard product-level LCA practice.

02

Greenhouse gases included

Reports include the seven Kyoto Protocol gases where they are material to the product's lifecycle: CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, HFCs, PFCs, SF₆ and NF₃. All gases are converted to CO₂-equivalent using GWP100 factors and reported as a single aggregated figure.

03

Emissions databases & references

Widely recognised sources for lifecycle assessment work.

Ecoinvent

Background lifecycle inventory for materials, energy and processes.

UK DEFRA GHG Conversion Factors

Fuels, transport modes, electricity, waste treatment (annual update).

GLEC Framework

Logistics and freight transport emissions across road, sea, air and rail.

International Energy Agency (IEA)

Country-level electricity grid emission factors.

EPA WARM Model

Waste management and end-of-life scenarios.

Peer-reviewed LCA studies

Category benchmarks (apparel, electronics, FMCG, beverages, cosmetics, etc.).

Emission factors are selected based on the best available match for the product's geography, technology and time period. Where multiple factors are applicable, we use the source most commonly cited in peer-reviewed product LCAs for that category.

04

Calculation pipeline

From URL to boardroom-ready report.

  1. 1

    Data extraction

    The product URL is fetched and parsed. Structured metadata (JSON-LD Product schema, Open Graph, retailer-specific fields) is extracted first, then supplemented with visible product copy — materials, weight, dimensions, country of origin, packaging, warranty and end-of-life instructions.

  2. 2

    Material & component classification

    Extracted attributes are mapped to lifecycle inventory categories (e.g. cotton, recycled PET, aluminium 6061, lithium-ion cell, cardboard). Composite products are decomposed into their principal components by mass share.

  3. 3

    Lifecycle stage modelling

    Each stage — materials, manufacturing, packaging, transport, use and end-of-life — is modelled independently using the datasets above. Transport is modelled from country of origin to destination market using GLEC modal factors. End-of-life uses country-specific waste treatment mixes.

  4. 4

    Aggregation

    Stage-level emissions are summed to a total kg CO₂e per unit and normalised to the report's headline figure, category benchmark comparison, and per-order calculator.

  5. 5

    AI review & consistency checks

    The draft footprint is cross-checked against peer LCA studies for the same category. Outliers (>2σ from category mean) are flagged, re-modelled, and either corrected or documented as legitimate outliers.

05

Lifecycle stage assumptions

Raw materials

Emissions from extraction, refining and processing to a market-ready feedstock. Recycled content is credited using cut-off allocation — recycled inputs carry only the burden of the recycling process, not the original virgin production.

Manufacturing

Energy and process emissions for component and product manufacture. Grid electricity uses the IEA factor for the manufacturing country; thermal energy uses DEFRA fuel factors.

Transport & distribution

Modelled using GLEC factors for the appropriate modal mix (road, sea, rail, air) between country of origin and destination market, including last-mile distribution.

Use phase

Included where the product consumes energy, water, or consumables in use. Assumes a category-typical duty cycle and lifetime; disclosed per report.

End of life

Modelled with EPA WARM and country-specific waste treatment mixes (recycling, incineration with/without energy recovery, landfill). Recycling credits are not applied at end-of-life to avoid double counting with cut-off recycled inputs.

Excluded

Capital goods, corporate overheads, employee commuting, and retail store operations are outside the product boundary.

06

AI-assisted modelling

How we handle missing or ambiguous data.

Product pages rarely disclose every input required for a full LCA. Where complete product information is unavailable, URLCarbon uses AI-assisted material recognition, engineering estimates, and category-specific modelling to infer missing values.

Typical inferred fields include material composition, product mass, packaging weight, country of manufacture, and typical use-phase duty cycle. Inferences are constrained by category priors derived from peer-reviewed LCA studies rather than free-form estimation.

These assumptions contribute to the report's confidence score and are transparently disclosed in the "Assumptions" and "Methodology & data sources" sections of every PDF. Increasing the underlying data quality — for example by supplying a bill of materials or a product spec sheet — raises the confidence score and can materially change the headline figure.

07

Confidence score

Every report carries a confidence score from Low to High, driven by four inputs:

Data completeness

Share of required inputs sourced directly from the product page vs inferred.

Source specificity

Whether emission factors match the exact geography, technology and year of production.

Category alignment

How closely the product matches a well-studied benchmark category.

Model consistency

Deviation from peer-reviewed LCA results for the same category.

08

Known limitations

  • Reports are estimates suitable for internal decision-making, supplier screening, buyer communication and category benchmarking. They are not a substitute for a certified, third-party-verified LCA or an EPD.
  • Emission factors carry inherent uncertainty (typically ±10–30% at the unit-process level). Aggregated product footprints inherit this uncertainty.
  • Use-phase emissions for products with highly variable consumer behaviour (e.g. clothing wash cycles) are modelled on category-typical assumptions, not individual user behaviour.
  • Biogenic carbon, land-use change, and non-GHG environmental impacts (water, biodiversity, toxicity) are not included in the headline figure.
09

Versioning & updates

Emission factors and category benchmarks are refreshed as source datasets publish updated versions (DEFRA annually, IEA annually, Ecoinvent on their release cadence). Each report records the methodology version used at the time of generation, so historical reports remain reproducible even as factors evolve.

See it in action

Read a sample report

See exactly how a URL becomes a boardroom-ready carbon intelligence brief — assumptions, confidence and all.

View sample report